Friday, 5 June 2020

Eng Comp II Touchtone 3.2

Eng Comp II Touchtone 3.2


Touchstone 3.2: Draft an Argumentative Research Essay

ASSIGNMENT: Using your outline and annotated bibliography from Touchstones 1.2 and 2.2, draft a 6-8 page argumentative research essay on your chosen topic.

As this assignment builds on Touchstone 2.2: Create an Annotated Bibliography, that Touchstone must be graded before you can submit your research essay draft.




https://hwacer.com/Tutorial/eng-comp-ii-touchtone-3-2/






A. Assignment Guidelines

DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Argumentative Thesis Statement
❒ Have you included a thesis in your introduction that takes a clear, specific position on one side of a debatable issue?
2. Argument Development
❒ Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?
❒ Is the argument supported using rhetorical appeals and source material?
❒ Is your essay 6-8 pages (approximately 1500-2000 words)? If not, which details do you need to add or remove?
3. Research
❒ Have you cited outside sources effectively using quotation, summary, or paraphrase techniques?
❒ Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?
❒ Have you referenced a range of at least 7 credible sources?
❒ Have you properly cited your sources according to APA style guidelines?
❒ Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay?
4. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?



B. Reflection

DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. Provide one example of a place where you have used rhetorical appeals or source material to support your argument. How does this enhance your essay? (2-3 sentences)
2. Touchstone 4 is a revision of this draft. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you as you revise? Are there parts of your draft that you’re uncertain of? (3-4 sentences


D. Requirements

The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
•Composition must be 6-8 pages (approximately 1500-2000 words).
•Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
•Use a readable 12-point font.
•All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.

 

Eng Comp II Touchtone 3.1

Eng Comp II Touchtone 3.1

 

Touchstone 3.1: Construct a Rogerian Argument

ASSIGNMENT: As you learned in this unit, a Rogerian argument is one that presents two sides of a debate and argues for a solution that will satisfy both sides. Given two articles presenting opposing sides of an issue (mandatory uniforms in schools), construct your own 2-3 page Rogerian argument essay in which you attempt to arrive at a workable solution or "middle ground."

Article 1: "School Dress Codes and Uniform Policies"

Article 2: "Dressing Diversity: Politics of Difference and the Case of School Uniforms"


A. Assignment Guidelines




https://hwacer.com/Tutorial/eng-comp-ii-touchtone-3-1/







DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Summary of Positions
❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 1?
❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented in Article 1?
❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 2?
❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented Article 2?
2. Thesis/Claim
❒ Does you claim address both sides of the issue, including specific points raised in the articles?
❒ Does your claim present a clear, workable solution that could be viewed as a "middle ground" between the two sides?
3. Analysis
❒ Have you backed up your claim using facts from both sides of the argument?
❒ When using direct quotations, have you supplemented them with your own explanation of their relevance?
4. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?


B. Reflection

DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. How does the Rogerian model of argument help you better understand the topic that’s being discussed? Why is it a good practice to acknowledge both sides of the argument? (3-4 sentences)
2. Will you use the Rogerian Approach in your own argumentative essay? Why or why not? (2-3 sentences)

D. Requirements

The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
•Composition must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words).
•Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
•Use a readable 12-point font.
•All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
•Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
•Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
•Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition

Eng Comp II Touchtone 2.2

Eng Comp II Touchtone 2.2


Touchstone 2.2: Create an Annotated Bibliography

ASSIGNMENT: Using your research question, working thesis, and outline from Touchstone 1.2, create an annotated bibliography that provides a synopsis of your sources and an explanation of how you will use them.

As this assignment builds on Touchstone 1.2: Write a Research Question, Thesis, and Outline, that Touchstone must be graded before you can submit your annotated bibliography


A. Assignment Guidelines

DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Annotated Bibliography





https://hwacer.com/Tutorial/eng-comp-ii-touchtone-2-2/








Make sure to:
❒ Alphabetize the entries, according to APA style.
❒ Include the required bibliographic information in APA format for each entry. ❒ Include 3-4 sentences for each entry that provide a short summary of the source and how you plan to use it to support your argument. ❒ Include at least seven entries in your annotated bibliography, all of which must be credible, academic sources. ❒ Choose your own sources, but use no more than three websites (there is no limit on the number of online journals used). ❒ Thoroughly check the formatting requirements for the different source types. ❒ Indicate the required sources (book, peer-reviewed journal, newspaper/magazine, and credible website) by including the source type in parentheses after the relevant entry.
2. Reflection
❒ Have you displayed a clear understanding of the research activities?
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?



B. Reflection Questions

DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. Accurately recording bibliographic information is essential and saves you time, as you can transfer this information to the References page of your drafted essay. Each source entry should include a brief summary of the source as well as 3-4 sentences describing how you intend to use that source to build or support your argument. Discuss how your annotated bibliography meets these criteria. (2-3 sentences)
2. Which strategies were most helpful for you when searching for credible sources? (2-3 sentences)
3. What difficulties did you face while searching for credible sources? How did you overcome these difficulties? (2-3 sentences)


D. Requirements

The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
•Double-space the bibliography entries and use one-inch margins.
•Use a readable 12-point font.
•All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
•Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
•Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
•Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
•Submission must include your reflection questions.
•Include all of the assignment components in a single file. •Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.

English Comp II Touchtone 2.1

English Comp II Touchtone 2.1


Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a Source

ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested.

The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)




https://hwacer.com/Tutorial/english-comp-ii-touchtone-2-1/







You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:

1. Credibility: Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.

2. Usefulness: Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?
Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.




A. Assignment Guidelines

DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Source Identification

The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:
❒ Have you provided the author's name? ❒ Have you provided the source title? ❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?
2. Source Evaluation
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's credibility? ❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on credibility? ❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's usefulness? ❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on usefulness?
3. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?



B. Reflection Questions

DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)

2. How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)

D. Requirements

The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
•Composition must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words).
•Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
•Use a readable 12-point font.
•All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
•Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
•Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
•Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.

Eng Comp II Touchstone 1.2

Eng Comp II Touchstone 1.2


Touchstone 1.2: Write a Research Question, Thesis, and Outline

ASSIGNMENT: Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below, choose an argumentative topic to research. This will be your topic throughout the entire course, so the activities required for this assignment will provide the foundation for your future Touchstones. The topic for an argumentative research paper must be a debatable topic, meaning that it involves conflicting viewpoints. Additionally, it cannot be a topic that is already decided or agreed upon by most of society. You will need to take a firm position on the topic and use evidence and logic to support the position. Touchstone 1.2 includes a research question, a working thesis, a detailed outline, and a reflection on this pre-writing process.


https://hwacer.com/Tutorial/eng-comp-ii-touchstone-1-2/








A. Topic Selection Guidelines

DIRECTIONS: You may choose any topic you wish as long as the topic has two clear sides and is not agreed upon by most of society. Your topic should be current, appropriate for an academic context and should have a focus suitable for a 6-8 page essay.


B. Research Guidelines

DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Research Question and Working Thesis

Keep in mind: The research question and working thesis are the driving force behind your research and eventual argument.
❒ Your research question should be a single sentence, framed as a question.
❒ Your working thesis should be a single focused sentence, framed as a statement that takes a clear position on the research question.
❒ Include your research question followed by your working thesis.

2. Detailed Outline

Keep in mind: Your detailed outline provides a map of the argumentative research essay that you will write, including your key claims and the sources that support them. You may not have all your sources yet, and that is fine. The outline is a way to organize your essay and determine which areas (e.g. your sub-points) will require researched evidence as support.
❒ Headings: one for each paragraph with a brief label of the paragraph’s controlling idea(s); at least 7 body paragraphs, an introduction, and a conclusion
❒ Introduction includes your working thesis.
❒ Body paragraphs should each have their own unique title and key points.
❒ Conclusion includes notes on your final thoughts.
❒ Subheadings: two to five for each paragraph, below each heading, indicating key points that support the controlling idea
❒ Sources: one to three for each subheading, as relevant, indicating the support for the key point
❒ For each source, include the author’s name and the idea or information relevant to your argument (e.g. “LappĂ© on mono-cropping corn/soy and production”).

3. Reflection
❒ Have you displayed a clear understanding of the research activities?
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?



C. Reflection Questions

DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. Learning to conduct research is important because it is a skill you will use both in academia and in your professional life. It improves critical thinking and empowers you to find information for yourself. Consider the process of researching as a whole. What was the most challenging aspect of the process for you? (2-3 sentences)
2. The working thesis statement is a proposed answer to your research question. It should clearly identify a debatable topic and take a position on one side of that topic. Analyze the effectiveness of your working thesis statement. (3-4 sentences)
3. A detailed outline is an effective tool for laying out the progression of an argument. It allows you to consider the arrangement and organization of your ideas, as well as choose places to incorporate outside source materials. Review your detailed outline and summarize the argument you've presented. (3-4 sentences)
4. You will use the same topic on three of the remaining Touchstones in this course. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you? What are specific questions you might have as you go deeper into the research process? (2-3 sentences)

Thursday, 4 June 2020

CIS 515 Database Modeling and Normalization

CIS 515 Database Modeling and Normalization


Imagine that you work for a consulting firm that offers information technology and database services. Part of its core services is to optimize and offer streamlined solutions for efficiency. In this scenario, your firm has been awarded a contract to implement a new personnel system for a government agency. This government agency has requested an optimized data repository for its system which will enable the management staff to perform essential human resources (HR) duties along with the capability to produce ad hoc reporting features for various departments. They look forward to holding data that will allow them to perform HR core functions such as hiring, promotions, policy enforcement, benefits management, and training.
Using this scenario, write a 3–4 page paper in which you:





https://hwacer.com/Tutorial/cis-515-database-modeling-and-normalization-2/







  • Determine the steps in the development of an effective Entity Relationship Model (ERM) Diagram and determine the possible iterative steps/factors that one must consider in this process with consideration of the HR core functions and responsibilities of the client.
  • Analyze the risks that can occur if any of the developmental or iterative steps of creating an ERM Diagram are not performed.
  • Select and rank at least 5 entities that would be required for the development of the data repositories.
  • Specify the components that would be required to hold time-variant data for policy enforcement and training management.
  • Diagram a possible 1:M solution that will hold salary history data, job history, and training history for each employee through the use of graphical tools. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length.
  • Plan each step of the normalization process to ensure the 3NF level of normalization using the selected 5 entities of the personnel database solution. Document each step of the process and justify your assumptions in the process.
  • Diagram at least 5 possible entities that will be required to sustain a personnel solution. The diagram should include the following:
  • Dependency diagrams.
  • Multivalued dependencies.
  • Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
  • Paper should be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (12-point), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, your professor's name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
  • Include charts or diagrams created in a drawing tool with which you are familiar. The completed diagrams or charts must be imported into the Word document before the paper is submitted.

HSA 550 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 5

HSA 550 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 5


  1. As a public health leader, formulate a plan for how you would deal with the alleged ethnic discrimination described in Case Study 23-A. Provide a rationale for your response.
  1. As a public health leader, formulate a plan for how you would deal with the alleged ethnic discrimination described in Case Study 23-A. Provide a rationale for your response.

https://hwacer.com/Tutorial/hsa-550-homework-assignment-5/








HSA 550 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 5


  1. As a public health leader, formulate a plan for how you would deal with the alleged ethnic discrimination described in Case Study 23-A. Provide a rationale for your response.
  1. As a public health leader, formulate a plan for how you would deal with the alleged ethnic discrimination described in Case Study 23-A. Provide a rationale for your response.

HSA 550 WEEK 7 JOURNAL ENTRY 3

HSA 550 WEEK 7 JOURNAL ENTRY 3


The Chronicles of a Leader Journal Overview
Worth 40 points apiece

The Chronicles of a Leader journal is an activity in which your leadership experiences are utilized to promote self-reflection, analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT), and track your leadership progress. The journal will also supplement your understanding of leadership theory and application in public health.



https://hwacer.com/Tutorial/hsa-550-week-7-journal-entry-3/








Journal entries are worth forty (40) points apiece and are located in Blackboard within the weeks in which they are due.

Journal Entry 3: What strategies would you use to increase your interpersonal communication skills with community partners? Explain your rationale.

FIN 317 Financing an Expansion Assignment

  FIN 317 Financing an Expansion Assignment   Financing an Expansion Overview After 12 years, your business is wildly successful, with multi...