Saturday 16 April 2016

PAD 525 Week 4 Discussion Question

PAD 525 Week 4 Discussion Question 1

  • Review Texas v. Johnson. Assuming you want to sustain the conviction, make the best argument you can for how that can be reconciled with the First Amendment. Of the opinions that would have sustained the conviction, which do you find most persuasive and why? 
  • Evaluating Van Orden v. Perry, as a public administrator, in the rule of law, explain to what extent your beliefs should affect your reactions to the various justices’ opinions.



  • Review Texas v. Johnson. Assuming you want to sustain the conviction, make the best argument you can for how that can be reconciled with the First Amendment. Of the opinions that would have sustained the conviction, which do you find most persuasive and why? 
  • Evaluating Van Orden v. Perry, as a public administrator, in the rule of law, explain to what extent your beliefs should affect your reactions to the various justices’ opinions.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

FIN 317 Financing an Expansion Assignment

  FIN 317 Financing an Expansion Assignment   Financing an Expansion Overview After 12 years, your business is wildly successful, with multi...