PAD 520 Week 5 Assignment 2 Stakeholder Analaysis
Assignment 2: Stakeholder
Analysis
Due Week 5 and worth 150 points
Due Week 5 and worth 150 points
Write a five to six
(5-6) page paper in which you:
(Note: Refer to Review Question 8 located at the end of Chapter 3 for criteria 1-3. Select two (2) editorials / essays / columns (by staff or freelance writers) on a current issue of public policy from two (2) different publications (large metropolitan or national newspaper such as Washington Post or the New York Times or national magazines such as Newsweek, Time, and The New Republic.)
(Note: Refer to Review Question 8 located at the end of Chapter 3 for criteria 1-3. Select two (2) editorials / essays / columns (by staff or freelance writers) on a current issue of public policy from two (2) different publications (large metropolitan or national newspaper such as Washington Post or the New York Times or national magazines such as Newsweek, Time, and The New Republic.)
1.
Apply the procedures for argumentation analysis (located in
Chapter 8) to display contending positions and underlying assumptions for the
content of Review Question 8.
2.
Rate the assumptions and plot them according to their
plausibility and importance. (Refer to Figure 3.16, “Distribution of warrant by
plausibility and importance.”)
3.
Determine which arguments are the most plausible. Provide a
rationale for your views.
(Note: Refer to
Demonstration Exercise 1 located at the end of Chapter 3 for criteria 4-6. Examine
Box 3.0 – Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis. Choose one of the following policy
issues in the U.S. gun control, illegal drugs, medical insurance fraud, and
environmental protection of waterways, job creation, affordable health care, or
Medicare.)
4.
Apply the procedures for stakeholder analysis presented in Box
3.0 “Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis” to generate a list of at least five to
ten (5-10) stakeholders who affect or are affected by problems in the issue
area chosen for analysis. (Note: Refer to page 111
of the textbook for a step-by-step process on stakeholder analysis.)
5.
After creating a cumulative frequency distribution from the
list, discuss new ideas generated by each stakeholder. (Note: The ideas may be objectives,
alternatives, outcomes causes, etc.; ideas should not be duplicates.)
6.
Write an analysis of the results of the frequency distribution
that answers the following questions: (a) Does the line graph flatten out? (b)
If so, after how many stakeholders? (c) What conclusions can be drawn about the
policy problems in the issue area? (Note: Compare your work with Case Study 3.1 at the end of the
chapter.)
7.
Include at least two (2) peer-reviewed references (no more than
five [5] years old) from material outside the textbook to support your views
regarding the proposed U.S. response to the conflict in Bosnia. Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references
include scholarly articles and governmental Websites. Do not use open source
Websites such as Wikipedia, Sparknotes.com, Ask.com, and similar Websites are
not acceptable resources.
Your assignment must
follow these formatting requirements:
·
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12),
with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or
school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional
instructions.
·
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the
student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover
page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page
length.
The specific course
learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
·
Examine the nature, characteristics, models, and / or methods
pertinent to the structuring of policy problems.
·
Use technology and information resources to research issues in
policy analysis and program evaluation.
·
Write clearly and concisely about policy analysis and program
evaluation using proper writing mechanics.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.